There has been much talk of late about the “Enemies List” that the Obama administration is working off of.  As a public service to our readers, we are publishing the items one must be aware of in order to be taken off the Obama Hate list.

You might be on Obama’s Enemies List if:

• If you have a degree from a college in something other than Law, Civics, Theater Arts, Education or Political ScienceIf you have ever attended a tea party or ever complained about paying your taxes

  If you make enough money to have to pay taxes

  If you have  looked at your Payroll Check and seen the name Fox Network.

  If you Have ever been been in the military (2x if you have actually fought for our country)

  If you refer to your camouflage clothing “my camos”

  If you have been overheard saying inflammatory things like, “I believe in the constitution of the United States”

  If you have never been a “community organizer” and don’t know what that means

  If you have your own health insurance and don’t need/want the governments help

  If you have interrogated anyone using harsh language

  If you have ever been proud of any of America’s accomplishments prior to January 17, 2009

  If you are Winston Churchill’s Bust

  If you own a gun, or a bullet, or even a gun holster (3x if you are an NRA member)

  If you are a Doctor and do not own a lab coat

  If you are an insurance company employee (4x if you are manager level or higher)

  If you have never read the following authors: Saul Alinsky, Karl Marx, or  Ernesto ‘Che’ Guevara

  If you don’t believe in global warming and don’t particularly like Al Gore (4x if you drive an SUV)

  If you think that bailout is something that should only be done to your boat or your worthless brother-in-law

  If you have ever referred to yourself as a ditto head or cried with Glenn Beck

  If you have never been or desire to be a Czar

  If you actually qualify to be a member of Obama’s administration by passing an FBI background check

  If you are not the member of any far left special interest group

  If you think that the US should remain a sovereign nation

  If you think that the US would be best served by getting out of the United and getting the United Nations out of the US

  If you like the idea of a strong dollar and weak inflation (3x if you have bought gold)

25+ Pack your bags and head to non-extradition country

20-25 See you in camp Obama

15-19 Eligible for a liberal re-education but still one of us

10-14 Welcome to the conservative underground, rookie

05-09 You need to buy a few more guns and re-test.

0 – 04 Are you an ACORN Employee?

Danny Powell

www.facefwd.com

If you have doubts about the Global Warming, Climate Change, or whatever they are calling these days treaty that is about to be signed by Obama in Copenhagen then you need to watch this video.  The you need to call, write, fax and email your government representatives and let them know how you feel. 

Who is this man?

Christopher Walter Monckton, 3rd Viscount Monckton of Brenchley (born 14 February 1952) is a British politician, business consultant, policy adviser, writer, columnist, inventor and hereditary peer. He served as an advisor to Margaret Thatcher’s policy unit in the 1980s and invented the Eternity puzzle at the end of the 1990s. More recently, he has attracted controversy for his public opposition to the mainstream scientific consensus on global warming. He also announced a sequel to his original puzzle called Eternity II in 2007, and it is still unsolved.

Monckton is critical of the theory of anthropogenic causes for global warming and the stated scope of it, which he regards as a controversy catalyzed by “the need of the international left for a new flag to rally round” following the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989.  He has expressed doubt about the reality of global warming in a number of newspaper articles and papers. In February 2007, he published a critique of the IPCC Fourth Assessment Report on climate change. His calculations of climate sensitivity to increased atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide have been published in the Quarterly Economic Bulletin.

In two Sunday Telegraph articles published in November 2006, Monckton disputed whether global warming is man-made, suggested that it is unlikely to prove catastrophic, and criticized the science presented by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). In particular, he has criticized the IPCC’s interpretation of the Medieval Warm Period, cited the “hockey stick” controversy as evidence of faulty science, argued that the science in the IPCC reports has misapplied the Stefan–Boltzmann law, and supported the solar variation theory as a possible explanation of global warming. In an apparent reference to claims made by Gavin Menzies, he further stated “There was little ice at the North Pole: a Chinese naval squadron sailed right round the Arctic in 1421 and found none.”

In response to the U.K. government’s Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change, he has argued that the review’s recommendation to invest 1% of global GDP in climate change mitigation would be ineffective, as would the introduction of carbon taxes and emissions trading as a means of curbing carbon emissions. He has proposed instead that the best solution should be to “go nuclear and reverse 20th-century deforestation.”

Monckton played a key role in a legal challenge heard in the High Court of Justice in October 2007 in a bid to prevent An Inconvenient Truth from being shown in English schools. In an interview with the conservative American talk radio host Glenn Beck, Monckton stated that he had prompted an unnamed friend to fund the case “to fight back against this tide of unscientific freedom-destroying nonsense” and had played a direct role in the litigation against the British government. He is also funding the distribution to schools of the controversial documentary The Great Global Warming Swindle as a riposte to Gore’s film.

Ending some nine months of closed-door deliberations, Sens. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) and John Kerry (D-Mass.) will release global warming legislation Wednesday that they hope will be the vehicle for broader Senate negotiations and an eventual conference with the House.

The bill’s authors said last week that they expect to start hearings early next month on the bill, with a markup in Boxer’s Environment and Public Works Committee to follow soon thereafter. They also acknowledged that their legislation is just a “starting point” in a bid to win over moderate and conservative Democrats, as well as Republicans.

“I hope what we’ve done is constructive and well-received,” Kerry, the chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee, said Thursday. “I have no pretensions, and neither does Barbara, that this will be the final product. It is a starting point, a commitment, full-fledged, across party lines to do what we need to do to protect the planet for the next century.”

The Boxer-Kerry bill will build in large part off H.R. 2454 (pdf), legislation approved in June by the House following several marathon months of negotiations that involved lawmakers representing coastal and industry-heavy districts. Exactly what is the same in the two bills remains to be seen. As for differences, Senate Democratic aides say they expect the legislation to divert from the House bill’s 17 percent emissions target for 2020 and go with an even more aggressive 20 percent limit. The bill also will stay silent on exactly how the Senate should divide up emission allowances.

At least five other Senate committees are also expected to contribute to the climate debate. The Foreign Relations and Agriculture committees are preparing language without convening a markup.

Commerce Chairman Jay Rockefeller (D-W.Va.) said he will hold votes on his pieces of the global warming bill. And the same goes for Finance Chairman Max Baucus (D-Mont.), who last week told reporters that provisions on international trade and the allocation of emission allowances would be marked up provided Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) says the bill is “clearly moving.”

Sen. Jeff Bingaman (D-N.M.) has already approved legislation (S. 1462 (pdf)) out of the Energy and Natural Resources Committee that includes a nationwide renewable electricity standard and a raft of other energy incentives, including a provision that could bring oil and gas rigs closer to Florida’s Gulf Coast. Bingaman is also planning a hearing Thursday on several competing cost estimates associated with the House-passed climate bill. The session, which was postponed once earlier this month, now gives senators an early public forum to sound off on the Boxer-Kerry bill.

Already last week, several Democratic senators working outside of the Boxer-Kerry camp said their ideas would be melded into the legislation at a later date. “It’s going to need a lot of work,” said Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio).

Kerry last week sought to change the vernacular surrounding the climate bill and sell its concepts more broadly, insisting it is not a “cap and trade” proposal but a “pollution reduction” bill. “I don’t know what ‘cap and trade’ means. I don’t think the average American does,” Kerry said. “This is not a cap-and-trade bill, it’s a pollution reduction bill”

For the rest of the article:

http://www.nytimes.com/cwire/2009/09/28/28climatewire-boxer-kerry-set-to-introduce-climate-bill-in-43844.html

By DARREN SAMUELSOHN of ClimateWire

Published: September 28, 2009

Face Fwd Comments:

No one has ever explained to me how this legislation is going to stop emissions. However, it is pretty easy to see how this little scheme is going to earn the government as well as cap and trade companies millions.

John Kerry, if you are reading I will explain Cap and Trade. One company is considered greener than another and they get carbon credits that they can either apply to a tax bill or sell to another company that has high carbon emissions. The low emissions company uses a third party broker like, Generation Investment Management, which is Al Gore’s company, to sell emission credits to the higher carbon emitting company.  They use those to offset their emissions and avoid EPA fines. The low emitting company makes a few bucks, the broker makes a commission, the big carbon company legalizes their pollution while avoiding fines and cleaning up their act, and the government gets to tax everyone. Same amount of pollution (although carbon is not really a pollution), however now the government gets a slice of the action and Al Gore opens a Panama Bank account.

I know what everyone is thinking…..that doesn’t impact me, I don’t have carbon emissions only businesses have that. Sorry, you are wrong. Actually, carbon is what we exhale when we breath so technically, you are a polluter according to this new legislation. And while that illustration may be a bit ridiculous, consider that every time you heat or cool your home, drive to work, or take the elevator to your floor you could be charged for carbon emissions. Certainly the companies that are providing you the energy and fuel to complete your daily task will be charged. To whom do you think they will pass that? You guessed it, you.

So you see, Cap and Trade is not about saving the world, stopping polluters, breeding baby pandas, or even cleaning up waste sites. Nope! It’s about making money for the IRS and the people that are to be given (political insiders) the Carbon Trading Franchises to be awarded by the government.

Frigid 2010 Forecast: How Cold will the Winter Weather Be? Old Man Winter doesn’t want to give up his frigid hold just yet, but his hold will mostly be in the middle of the country.

According to the 2010 Farmers’ Almanac, this winter will see more days of shivery conditions: a winter during which temperatures will average below normal for about three-quarters of the nation.

A large area of numbingly cold temperatures will predominate from roughly east of the Continental Divide to west of the Appalachians (see map). The coldest temperatures will be over the northern Great Lakes and the Upper Peninsula of Michigan. But acting almost like the bread of a sandwich, to this swath of unseasonable cold will be two regions with temperatures that will average closer to normal—theWest Coast and the East Coast.

What about snow/rain/ice? Near-normal amounts of precipitation are expected over the eastern third of the country, as well as over the Pacific Northwest and Northern Plains, while drier-than-normal conditions are forecast to occur over the Southwest and the Upper Midwest/Great Lakes.  Only the Central and Southern Plains are expected to receive above-average amounts of precipitation.

Blizzards?  While three-quarters of the country is predicted to see near- or below average precipitation this winter, that doesn’t mean there won’t be any winter storms! On the contrary, significant snowfalls are forecast for parts of every zone. For the Middle Atlantic and Northeast States, for instance, we are predicting a major snowfall in mid-February; possibly even blizzard conditions for New England (indeed, even shovelry is not dead).

Thanks to the Farmers Almanac for their information.  If you would like more information on weather or for information on the Farmer’s Almanac click on the following link:

http://www.farmersalmanac.com/weather/a/could-this-winters-weather-add-to-economic-woes

Face Fwd Comments:

If you have been following the Sunspots in the news you know that there is a huge correlation between our sun’s activity and the weather.  Sunspot activity over the last 18 months has largely abated which has brought on last years cold weather and this years predicted cold winter.  Does it surprise anyone that Sunspot Activity over the last 400 years and that the weather patterns (yes Al, there is no human induced global warming) including the warmer weather during period between the industrial revolution and now almost perfectly are in sync.  Check out this graph:

If you are interested in learning more about how sunspots impact our weather you will want to look up information on the Maunder Minimum.  You might be surprised to see what all of the hub bub is about. 

 In my opinion the science has now become undeniable that the sun is the villain (or hero depending on your stance) in climate change.  I firmly believe that the only thing stopping Al Gore/the Obama administration and the United Nations from embracing this science, is that they have not figured out how to tax the sun.   Don’t worry America…….Al is working on it.