Listening to the Obama Administration: hoaxes, propaganda, hypnotic tactics, and false surveys
Chamber Renounces Cap and Trade Statements as a Hoax
The U.S. Chamber of Commerce on Monday said that a press release declaring the group had dropped its opposition to climate change legislation was a hoax. The fake press release, which declared the Chamber had done an “about-face on climate policy” following the defection of prominent members, was briefly picked up by Reuters and several other media organizations.
But the Chamber sent out a counter-release setting the record straight.
“Public relations hoaxes undermine the genuine effort to find solutions on the challenge of climate change,” spokesman Thomas Collamore said. “These irresponsible tactics are a foolish distraction from the serious effort by our nation to reduce greenhouse gases.”
He said the group would call for law enforcement to investigate.
But Politico.com reported that the liberal activist group The Yes Men took responsibility for the hoax — apparently part of a broader effort to undermine the Chamber in its opposition to cap-and-trade legislation and other Obama administration priorities. Politico.com reported Monday that Democrats in Congress and the White House are doing an end run around the Chamber of Commerce to weaken their political influence by dealing directly with individual CEOs.
For the rest of the article please go here:
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/10/19/chamber-statement-announcing-support-climate-hoax/
Here is a second headline
U.S. hunters, anglers lobby for climate bill
A nationwide survey the NWF commissioned in 2006 found that half of all licensed hunters and anglers counted themselves as “evangelical Christians,” a heavily Republican group. A 2008 NWF poll of over 1,000 hunters and fishers found that over half classified themselves as “politically conservative.” The respondents were mostly white, male and middle-aged — classic Republican demographic.
Even so, 85 percent agreed with the statement: “We can improve the environment and strengthen the economy by investing in renewable energy technologies that create jobs while reducing global warming.” Lindsey Graham, a conservative Republican senator from South Carolina, broke ranks with his party and outlined a compromise to limit carbon emissions in a New York Times opinion piece he co-wrote with Democratic Senator John Kerry.
That won him praise from national hunting groups and local ones in South Carolina, which has a robust outdoor sports culture woven into its rural fabric
For the Rest of this article please go here:
Face Fwd Comments:
This is what we call propaganda. The first one has been caught and refuted the second will soon be.
The statement that the Cap and Trade spin masters use, “we can improve the environment and strengthen the economy by investing in renewable energy technologies that create jobs while reducing global warming” is such a set up statement. Which part of the confusing question are you answering? Are you answering that you believe in the American spirit that we can create new technologies? Are you agreeing
that we can improve the environment? Or are you endorsing a claim of global warming?
Notice how the first part of the question says, “We can improve the environment”. Every outdoorsman believes that the environment can be improved and should be. In Hypnotism that is called an agreement statement. When working to put an individual in a trance, you lead them with two absolutes then adding a third part that may be plausible (but not necessarily true). “While setting in the chair (1) with your hands in your lap (2) your eyes are getting heavy (3)”. Carefully crafted questions can lead the person being asked the question to answer in the manner desired.
Here is an excerpt on hypnotism you may find interesting found at www.inducetrance.com:
Agreement tactics in conversational hypnosis are very functional. You will learn to use these for two different reasons. The first reason to use agreement tactics is to put the critical factor in your subject’s mind to sleep.
The critical factor which tells people whether or not something is believable needs to be turned off in order to induce a good trance and to make suggestions that will hold true when the person is not under hypnosis.
This is the second reason you will use agreement tactics. Once the critical factor is turned off you will want your suggestions to seem realistic, agreement tactics do just that. They get the listener in the habit of agreeing with you and lend you the authority in their altered state of mind.
The hunting question is just one of many examples. Listen to Obama’s speeches. He (or whomever is crafting the questions) is a master at asking agreement statements then leading the listener to agree to statements that when asked by themselves would have never be agreed to on their own.
Between the hoaxes, propaganda, hypnotic tactics, and false surveys we are under attack like never before. It make sense now when you hear that the White House is trying to take down Fox news, the opposition news. Read and research to discover what is real. Listen not only to what is being said, but to how it is being said, and you may discover the hidden “lies” in the information being released from the Obama Administration.
