From the Wall Street Journal – Rage at Government for Doing Too Much and Not Enough
Tuesday, October 13th, 2009WASHINGTON — Americans have historically swung between anger at big business and anger at Washington. This year their rage has targeted business and government with equal fury.
Public frustration over Wall Street failures that led to the financial crisis was typified by
the uproar over bonus payments to American International Group Inc. executives. Those feelings haven’t dissipated, political strategists say. At the same time, Americans are equally upset at what they call overreaching by Congress and federal bureaucrats, with protesters taking to the streets to decry “socialism” and a “government takeover” of the economy.
Policy makers face a quandary. With voters simultaneously recoiling at laissez-faire policies and a big-government approach neither party in Washington seems capable of corralling an angry public.
“I think this is a very populist moment,” said Vin Weber, a former Minnesota congressman and now a top Republican strategist. “People held onto their distrust of big business and Wall Street, but what has happened is their distrust of big government has come back as well.”
Last year when Barack Obama won the presidency and Democrats swept to big congressional majorities, commentators heralded the dawn of a “new New Deal.” Time magazine put Mr. Obama on its cover sporting a cigarette-holder in a pose reminiscent of Franklin Roosevelt. Democrats sought support for an ambitious agenda that included a stimulus package, an overhaul of the health-care system and a bill to address climate change.
Along the way, they have encountered an angry distrust of government, and politicians of all stripes, that is palpable in tea-party groups forming around the country.
“I have had I don’t know how many politicians ask, ‘Can I speak at your tea party?’” said Catherina Wojtowicz, coordinator of the Chicago Tea Party group. Her response: “Honestly, it’s your turn now to shut up, sit down and listen.
For the rest of this article:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125539072998381441.html?mod=WSJ_hpp_MIDDLENexttoWhatsNewsSecond


